|
pony-horse
|
 |
« on: December 31, 2008, 11:50:53 AM » |
|
so i was wondering- do u guys like the old or new covers better? i personally like the old covers, how aout you?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
horse gal
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2008, 03:19:37 PM » |
|
there is new ones?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cem
|
|
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2008, 04:58:27 PM » |
|
Far as I can find there aren't new CH covers. There are new Heartland covers though. Or you may have seen the Britich covers beside American ones, cause they're different. Very different. Either way, there aren't new CH covers that I've found.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
horse gal
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2008, 06:08:13 PM » |
|
i havn't seen new covers of each!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
star watcher
Guest
|
|
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2009, 05:58:48 AM » |
|
Far as I can find there aren't new CH covers. There are new Heartland covers though. Or you may have seen the Britich covers beside American ones, cause they're different. Very different. Either way, there aren't new CH covers that I've found.
i havn't seen them,but does no:11 true enough still have ashely and amy and bright magic on its cover? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cem
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2009, 09:11:22 AM » |
|
Not all of them have been redone yet. Thats one of the not done ones, so I don't know whats on it lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
star watcher
Guest
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2009, 01:16:16 PM » |
|
okay, lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sportychick
Guest
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2009, 04:55:48 PM » |
|
i havn't seen any new ones
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cem
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2009, 04:06:10 AM » |
|
If you go to Amazon.com (or .co.uk) and search Lauren Brooke then order them by publication date you'll see the new ones.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sportychick
Guest
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 10, 2009, 07:58:56 AM » |
|
okay thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
strwbewi
Green
Posts: 8
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 13, 2009, 09:09:12 PM » |
|
old covers! old covers! old covers! the new ones suck. the old ones are really neat, the look more like teen books. the new ones look a bit more childish. the old ones are absolutely fantastic! i dunno why they changed them. its wonderful!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
pony-horse
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 27, 2009, 06:38:38 PM » |
|
i know of a few different styles.... 1 -old old style (my personal fav)  2 - the UK ones  3 - new-ish ones (i dont mind these ones)  4 - and this one i found just now on google, its kind of like the old old ones  i wish they'd stop changing them, though. i like my books to match |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 28, 2009, 12:58:53 PM by pony-horse »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cem
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 27, 2009, 06:55:53 PM » |
|
Okay, can I just point something out here? The second one is a UK cover. Not old or new, just the UK one. They haven't changed the UK covers since they were released. And you may think they're childish, but I think they fit the age range of the books.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
pony-horse
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 28, 2009, 12:58:24 PM » |
|
oh whoops. i didnt know they were just uk, ill chang it
and i still think its childish. i know since ur 20 or something and thses kids are like 7 years younger it might seem appropriate, but i still think its childish
but lets not get into a fight over this. it doesnt really matter.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cem
|
|
« Reply #14 on: April 28, 2009, 07:26:04 PM » |
|
Oh wasn't saying it to star t a dissagreement, lol just saying my opinion, like you did by saying it's childish. Can I ask though, and this is just out of curiosity, but if they were the only covers, would they seem so childish? Or is it just cause they seem it compared to the US ones?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
